|Origin Of Afghanistan|
|Role of different nations|
Former President Asif Ali Zardari told the French newspaper Le Monde in August 2010 that “coalition forces are losing the war against the (Afghan) Taliban in Afghanistan. during this war, the planet must unite and not divide.”
“Although the (Afghan) Taliban are unlikely to return to power in Afghanistan, their grip is already strong. the foremost important thing is that we are losing the battle to win the hearts and minds of the people.”
“US and allied forces have misjudged the bottom realities of Afghanistan.” the utilization of force alone cannot win wars.
“The us has denied the allegations during a statement issued Friday stating “Similar, baseless allegations concerning Russia’s intelligence are made quite once.
Eleven years later, Prime Minister Imran Khan reaffirmed the previous president’s position that Pakistan has always sided with the us , but he has always called us bad.
Former President Zardari, while predicting the longer term , had said that the us and NATO were on the bottom . Contrary to reality,
if the policy of conquering hearts had been adopted rather than conquering the land, the us wouldn’t have suffered the worst defeat today.
It’s going to be recalled that in his column published in ‘Jahan-e-Pakistan’ on June 11, Rahim had highlighted the necessity for a transparent policy statement from the Prime Minister on the rumors of giving air bases to the us .
On summer solstice , the Prime Minister finally made a policy statement to the planet Broadcasting Corporation, which clarified the ambiguous policy and almost put an end to the rumors.
Criticism of the opposition still lingers, but after the Prime Minister’s policy statement, government ministers and diplomats also openly stated their position, although earlier their explanations kept coming, but they added to the suspicions.
There was also talk about convening a special in-camera meeting by the Assembly. The position of Senators Sherry Rehman and HinaRabbani Khar is additionally noteworthy considering the role of Pakistan and what is going to be the role of Pakistan within the outcome of the present talks. Is preparing for variety of possible scenarios for the longer term .
The current situation today fully reflects the uncertainty that former President Asif Ali Zardari had openly expressed his views on during his tenure.
consistent with sources, the recruitment process for armed militant groups on ethnic and sectarian grounds has begun in Afghanistan, which threatens to divide the Pashtuns and other ethnic units administratively in proportion to the population.
The population is 42 to 48 percent and therefore the number of other ethnic units, especially Tajiks, is 20 to 25 percent, while Hazara, Uzbek, Aimaq, Turkmenistan, Baloch, Pashayi, Nuristani, Arab, Brahui, Pamiri, Gerger, etc., are more or less 30 to 33 percent.
International powers believe that the Afghan Taliban’s influence is bigger within the Pashtun region which other armed militant militias have infiltrated non-Pashtun areas, so it’s thought that the shortage of a final judgment on the rule of law could lead on to a war .
The series will begin. The partition plan involved the formation of a coalition (interim) government with ethnic and political units in Afghanistan, but the Afghan president called the US draft unworkable.
During a recent visit, President Ashraf Ghani once more tried his best to stop the withdrawal of coalition forces, but to no avail.
However, US officials told the Afghan Taliban that they might maintain 650 troops to guard their embassy.
Has reacted sharply, raising fears that if Turkey and therefore the us remain stationed at Kabul airport in Kabul, there would be a risk of a confrontation with foreign forces that would cause a peace formula in Afghanistan.
the probabilities of the talks succeeding are slim, but consistent with Dr. Abdullah Abdullah, talks with the Afghan Taliban will continue until they themselves deny it.
This is a really complicated situation which is facing Pakistan besides Afghanistan at the instant , because in any unforeseen situation the country will need to undergo new trials.
God willing, if there’s a war , an outsized influx of refugees will migrate to Pakistan. And anti-national elements could also be hiding in them, which can once more increase the incidence of terrorism, Pak.
The Afghan border management system is predicted to be completed by the time the US withdraws, after which Pakistan are going to be ready to use its ability to seal its borders in emergencies, but identifying extremists within the new Afghan refugee relay are going to be a difficult task, the refugees said.
Arrivals can’t be stopped thanks to law of nations , banning the arrival of refugees under UN pressure would be tantamount to gambling. In these circumstances, Pakistan also will need to fight its enemies from three sides, and therefore the refore the United States’ policy of not participating in airfields and the Afghan war will only increase the resentment and distance. Will face a standard strategy must be devised beforehand to counter this. consistent with the previous president, “we are losing the battle to win the hearts and minds of the people.
” For an efficient political and defense strategy, the state must call APCs of all political parties inside and out of doors Parliament. Parliamentary parties are given these camera briefings before, in other words, the ‘people’ in confidence. Taking is best for all folks .